Day 3 · Wednesday · Student answer key

Answers and explanations

Use after the class and problem setCheck the reason, not only the letter
Answer first

This key is released after submission. The questions it answers are on the pre-class check, the two studios and the problem set for this day. Work through them and commit to an answer before you read the explanations here: the point of every question is the reasoning, and a letter you have not argued for teaches you nothing.

Remember

Use this sheet after you have submitted your choices. For every mistake, name which boundary you missed: information time, validation, metric, population, or audit.

Pre-class concept check

ItemAnswerWhy
P1BThe leaf reports \(17/23\), but a small, selected leaf can be unstable and uncalibrated on future cases.
P2CThe training gain accompanied by later collapse is evidence that added depth fitted development-specific detail.
P3DRealised departure delay is observed only after the score is meant to exist.
P4BEarlier-to-later folds imitate monthly updating; a random whole-year split mixes future and past regimes.
P5BPrecision at the highest 10% directly matches a ten-per-cent inspection capacity.
P6BTrying many choices makes the validation folds part of selection, so the winner may contain favourable noise.

In-class concept studio

ItemAnswerWhy
C1AObserved first-48-hour data can support prediction of payment, not the effect or value of outreach.
C2DSeven-day viewing is unavailable at the 48-hour score.
C3CDepth 6 has the highest declared mean AP and does not win by one isolated fold.
C4AForest wins the declared full-ranking measure; logistic wins the stated highest-fifth measure.
C5BSystem B places both failures inside the only three inspections the desk can make.
C6BEqual AUC means equal correct pair ordering in aggregate, not equal membership at a cutoff.
C7AThe arithmetic describes concentration among selected units; no untreated counterfactual identifies prevention.
C8CThe 0.71 system uses information that arrives after the 48-hour clock.
C9BThe number can be studied for a later decision only after redefining the question and evaluation.
C10BA final audit judges a frozen system once; revisions require new untouched evidence.

Empirical studio

ItemAnswerWhy
E1BEligibility is known retrospectively, so the supplied rows support only the conditional retrospective ranking claim.
E2DRealised departure delay occurs after the pre-departure information cutoff.
E3BRolling folds reproduce the direction from past fitting to later use.
E4AAP 0.3325 exceeds the no-skill reference 0.2251 within the stated audit population; AP is not accuracy or an effect.
E5APrecision among the 900 selected flights is \(350/900=0.3889\).
E6CA live study must define eligibility for every flight at the scoring clock, before later completion and label status are known.

After-class problem set

ItemAnswerWhy
S1CTraining improvement cannot choose between partitions; later stability does, with simplicity preferred under a tie.
S2AThe maximum of many repeatedly inspected scores selects favourable validation noise.
S3BEnd-of-August outcomes are future information for earlier August predictions.
S4BEvery transformation must be learned on the training window and then applied unchanged to its later judge window.
S5BUnrewarded complexity adds estimation and governance cost without evidence of operational gain.
S6BAP evaluates the ranking broadly; top-decile precision evaluates one operating cutoff.
S7CThe score belongs to an after-departure information set, not the original pre-departure study.
S8BMoving the clock changes the possible action and therefore the entire prediction contract.
S9CEqual monthly counts support comparison in this sample, not annual prevalence inference.
S10BThe desk cannot know in advance which flights will later satisfy the study's completion and label conditions.
S11BOnce audit outcomes guide a change, they are no longer untouched audit evidence.
S12BThe redesigned unit, outcome, clock, action, and label gap all belong to the same prospective cancellation decision.

← Day 3 lecture  ·  All four days →

Oxford · United Kingdom Course home Teaching CV
University of Oxford