Case studies · 2007

The 2007-08 chain: BNP to Northern Rock to Bear to Lehman to AIG

A funding freeze that started with two suspended funds spread bank by bank until the world's fourth-largest investment bank failed and the largest insurer needed a rescue.

2007 Lecture 8 · Securitisation Lecture 4 Bonds Swaps Margin & liquidity spiral Model risk Leverage
When9 August 2007 (BNP Paribas) to 3 October 2008 (TARP), just under fourteen months
WhereFrance, the United Kingdom and the United States, spreading through global wholesale funding markets
WhoBNP Paribas, Northern Rock, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, AIG, the Reserve Primary Fund, the Bank of England, the Federal Reserve and the US Treasury
InstrumentMortgage-backed and structured credit bonds, financed short-term through repo and commercial paper; credit default swaps referenced only as background (out of scope for this course)
PositionLong-dated, hard-to-value structured credit assets funded with short-dated, continuously rolled borrowing
SizeLehman filed with about $639bn in assets; AIG's federal rescue peaked at about $182.3bn committed
The one-line lesson. Once a bundle of assets cannot be confidently priced, no one will lend against it, and a solvent firm can be forced into a fire sale purely because it cannot roll its funding.

What happened

A Paris fund manager stops answering the phone

Most economists and central bankers date the start of the global financial crisis to 9 August 2007. On that day, BNP Paribas Investment Partners suspended redemptions on three funds, together worth around €2bn, that held subprime mortgage-backed paper. The bank's own explanation was a "complete evaporation of liquidity" in the market for that paper: it could no longer produce a reliable price for the assets. Nothing about the loans behind the funds had necessarily gone bad overnight. What had changed was that no one would quote a price for them, and that alone was enough to turn a valuation problem into a funding problem.

The freeze crosses the Channel

The freeze reached the United Kingdom within weeks. Northern Rock, a UK mortgage lender, had grown by funding long-term mortgages with short-term wholesale borrowing, much of it rolled every few days in the money markets that had just seized up. On 14 September 2007 the Bank of England confirmed it was providing emergency liquidity support to the bank. The announcement did not calm depositors; it triggered exactly the run it was meant to prevent. Queues formed outside branches, and depositors withdrew an estimated £4.6bn within days, on top of large withdrawals on the first day alone. This was the United Kingdom's first bank run in more than a century. Two private rescue bids failed, and the government nationalised Northern Rock on 22 February 2008.

The same funding logic, a much bigger balance sheet

Bear Stearns' collapse six months later applied the same funding logic to a much larger, much more leveraged balance sheet. Bear financed its holdings of mortgage and structured credit assets overnight, through repurchase agreements (repo) that had to be renewed continuously. In the second week of March 2008, its repo counterparties simply stopped rolling. The firm's pool of liquid assets collapsed from about $18.1bn to about $2bn in a matter of days, and on 13 to 14 March 2008 Bear told the Federal Reserve Bank of New York it would file for bankruptcy the next morning without help. A rescue followed instead. JPMorgan Chase agreed to acquire Bear Stearns, backed by New York Fed financing, at an initial price of about $2 a share on 16 to 17 March 2008, later revised upward to about $10 a share once the deal drew criticism as too cheap.

One week in September

The chain reached its worst point in a single week in September 2008. On 15 September, Lehman Brothers Holdings filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the largest bankruptcy filing in US history, with about $639bn in assets and $619bn in debt. The very next day, the Federal Reserve authorised up to $85bn in emergency lending to keep the insurer AIG from collapsing, after its Financial Products unit had written enormous amounts of protection, economically similar to insurance, on senior tranches of mortgage-backed CDOs. That same day, 16 September, the Reserve Primary Fund, a money market fund marketed to investors as almost as safe as cash, "broke the buck": its net asset value fell to $0.97 a share because of a $785m position in Lehman commercial paper that had to be marked to zero. Even instruments treated as cash-equivalent were exposed to a single counterparty's failure. Three weeks later, on 3 October 2008, the US Congress passed the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act, creating the $700bn Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) to try to stop the chain going any further.

The slow decline underneath

Behind all of this sat a housing market that was simply declining, quietly, in the background. The S&P/Case-Shiller US National Home Price Index fell by around 27% from its mid-2006 peak to its 2012 trough. That slow-moving decline is what eventually made the mortgage-backed paper at the centre of the crisis worth much less than its face value.

Timeline, the 2007-08 crisis chain
DateEvent
9 Aug 2007BNP Paribas suspends redemptions on three funds (about €2bn) holding subprime asset-backed paper, citing a "complete evaporation of liquidity". Widely treated as the crisis's start date.
14 Sep 2007The Bank of England confirms emergency liquidity support for Northern Rock. The announcement triggers a retail deposit run, the UK's first bank run in over a century.
22 Feb 2008Northern Rock is taken into UK state ownership after two private takeover bids fail.
13-14 Mar 2008Bear Stearns' liquid asset pool collapses from about $18.1bn to about $2bn as repo counterparties refuse to roll funding; the firm warns it will file for bankruptcy without help.
16-17 Mar 2008JPMorgan Chase agrees to acquire Bear Stearns at about $2 a share, backed by New York Fed financing; revised to about $10 a share on 24 March 2008.
15 Sep 2008Lehman Brothers Holdings files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, the largest bankruptcy filing in US history (about $639bn in assets, $619bn in debt).
16 Sep 2008The Federal Reserve authorises up to $85bn in emergency lending to AIG. The same day, the Reserve Primary Fund "breaks the buck", its net asset value falling to $0.97 a share on a $785m Lehman position.
3 Oct 2008The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act creates the $700bn Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP).

The mechanics, in course language

No single derivative contract anchors this case. The chain is instead the connective tissue between several course ideas, all bearing on the same underlying constraint: funding, not solvency, is what broke first at every institution in the chain.

Repo as a margined position

The underlying position was the same shape at every institution in the chain: long positions in mortgage-backed and structured credit bonds, including the tranched securities covered under Lecture 8's securitisation material, financed short-term through commercial paper conduits and repo. That is a maturity mismatch, financed the same way a margined derivatives position is financed: with short-dated, collateralised borrowing that has to be rolled continuously. Overnight repo works exactly like a margined futures position. The borrower posts collateral and a haircut, and if the lender raises the haircut, or simply refuses to roll, the borrower must find cash immediately or sell the asset into an already falling market. Bear Stearns' collapse is a textbook margin-liquidity spiral: haircuts on structured collateral rose from a few per cent to double digits within weeks, and a firm whose business model depended on continuous overnight rollover could not survive a run by its own lenders.

A leverage ratio with almost no room in it

Leverage decided how much room each firm had before that spiral turned fatal. Bear Stearns entered 2008 with roughly 35 times leverage. A small percentage loss in asset value was therefore enough to wipe out shareholder equity entirely, the same lesson found in the course's interest-rate and duration material on how leverage magnifies a given price move.

When the mark itself disappears

The BNP Paribas suspension is the cleanest illustration of model risk in the whole chain. The funds were suspended not because the underlying loans had necessarily defaulted, but because no reliable price could be produced for the tranches. When a model's inputs, comparable trades and dealer quotes, disappear, the mark itself disappears, and a valuation problem becomes a funding problem overnight.

One seller holding the tail risk

AIG illustrates what happens when a large, correlated tail risk is concentrated with one seller. AIG Financial Products had effectively sold protection, economically similar to insurance, on senior tranches of CDOs at a scale that concentrated risk that should have been spread across many counterparties into one firm. This course keeps credit default swap mechanics out of scope; the simple version holds: insurance on the bundles, written by one seller, at a very large scale.

The run reaches instruments marketed as cash

The Reserve Primary Fund extends the same funding-run logic from banks to corporate treasury cash management. Money market funds are widely treated as cash-equivalent, but that trust was misplaced in this case: the fund's 1.26% exposure to Lehman commercial paper was enough to break a fund holding $62.5bn in assets. Even "safe" collateral carries counterparty risk.

The mathematics

Bear Stearns' leverage ratio at the end of fiscal 2007 fixes the size of the cushion between a survivable loss and insolvency, and with it, the small asset-price decline that would have been enough to wipe out its equity.

Bear Stearns held net equity of about $11.1bn against total assets of about $395.0bn, so:

$$\text{leverage} = \frac{\text{assets}}{\text{equity}} = \frac{395.0}{11.1} \approx 35.6\times$$

That same ratio, inverted, gives the break-even decline in asset value that would wipe out all shareholder equity:

$$\text{break-even decline} = \frac{\text{equity}}{\text{assets}} = \frac{11.1}{395.0} \approx 2.81\%$$

Small percentage moves compound quickly against a cushion this thin:

Checked in Python
equity = 11.1   # USD bn, Bear Stearns net equity, FY2007
assets = 395.0  # USD bn, Bear Stearns total assets, FY2007

leverage = assets / equity                    # 35.59x
breakeven_decline_pct = equity / assets * 100  # 2.81%

for decline_pct in [1, 2, 3]:
    asset_loss = assets * decline_pct / 100
    pct_of_equity_wiped = asset_loss / equity * 100
    print(f"{decline_pct}% fall in asset value -> loss of ${asset_loss:,.2f}bn -> wipes out {pct_of_equity_wiped:.1f}% of equity")

Output

1% fall in asset value -> loss of $3.95bn -> wipes out 35.6% of equity
2% fall in asset value -> loss of $7.90bn -> wipes out 71.2% of equity
3% fall in asset value -> loss of $11.85bn -> wipes out 106.8% of equity

A different number appears elsewhere: some secondary sources round Bear Stearns' 2007 leverage to "33 to 1", and describe its investment-bank peers as levered "up to 40 to 1" in the same period. That is not a contradiction of the 35.6x figure above, only a rounder version of the same story. This page uses 35.6x throughout because it is recomputed directly from the stated equity and asset figures, and should be read as an order-of-magnitude figure rather than a single precisely audited number.

Data and facts

Key verified numbers
QuantityValueSource
BNP Paribas fund suspension, 9 Aug 2007≈€2bn (3 funds)FCIC archive of contemporaneous MarketWatch report; NBC News
Northern Rock deposit withdrawals, Sep 2007≈£4.6bn within daysYale Program on Financial Stability case study
Bear Stearns liquidity pool, 10→13 Mar 2008$18.1bn → $2bnYale Program on Financial Stability case study
Bear Stearns leverage, FY2007≈35.6× (equity $11.1bn / assets $395bn)Recomputed from Bear Stearns FY2007 disclosures (see maths note)
Bear/JPMorgan Chase acquisition price$2.00/share → $10.00/shareJPMorgan Chase 8-K filings, SEC EDGAR
Lehman Brothers bankruptcy filing, 15 Sep 2008$639bn assets / $619bn debtWidely corroborated press accounts of the bankruptcy filing
AIG emergency Fed credit line, 16 Sep 2008up to $85bnFederal Reserve press release, 16 Sep 2008
AIG total government commitment (peak)≈$182.3bnUS Treasury; Congressional Research Service R42953
Reserve Primary Fund NAV, 16 Sep 2008$0.97/share (on $785m Lehman exposure)Yale Program on Financial Stability case study
TARP authorisation, 3 Oct 2008$700bnUS GAO GAO-24-107033; US Treasury
Case-Shiller US National Home Price Index decline, 2006-2012≈27%FRED series CSUSHPINSA

The lesson

  • Margin and repo haircuts turn a valuation problem into a liquidity problem overnight. Once a bundle of assets cannot be confidently priced, no one will lend against it, and a solvent firm can be forced into a fire sale purely because it cannot roll its funding.
  • High leverage compresses the cushion between a survivable loss and insolvency to a very small percentage move. A firm carrying roughly 35 times leverage did not need to be insolvent to fail. It only needed enough of its lenders to stop rolling repo for a few days.
  • Concentrating a large, correlated tail risk with one seller, as AIG did by writing protection on senior CDO tranches at scale, turns a risk that could have been diversified across the market into a single point of failure for the whole financial system.
  • The crisis spread through funding relationships, repo counterparties, commercial paper investors and money market fund holders, faster than through the underlying mortgage losses themselves. The chain from BNP to Lehman took thirteen months, but each link failed within days once its own funding was pulled.
  • Instruments marketed as cash-equivalent, such as a "prime" money market fund, are not free of counterparty risk. A 1.26% exposure to Lehman paper was enough to break a fund holding $62.5bn in assets.

Where it appears in the course

Think about it

  1. BNP Paribas suspended its funds because it could not value them, not because it had confirmed large losses. Why can an inability to price an asset be just as dangerous to a financial firm as a confirmed loss?
  2. Bear Stearns and Lehman were both financed heavily through short-term, rolling funding. If you were a risk manager at a similarly financed firm in 2007, what early warning signs in your own funding book would you have wanted to monitor closely?
  3. AIG's rescue and the Reserve Primary Fund breaking the buck both happened on 16 September 2008. What does the closeness of these two events tell you about how connected different parts of the financial system, insurance, banking and money market funds, had become by 2008?

Sources

  1. Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission (archive of contemporaneous MarketWatch report), "BNP suspends funds", 9 August 2007. fcic-static.law.stanford.edu
  2. Bank of England, "Liquidity support facility for Northern Rock plc", press notice, 14 September 2007. bankofengland.co.uk
  3. Yale Program on Financial Stability / Journal of Financial Crises, "United Kingdom: Northern Rock Emergency Liquidity Program, 2007", by Bailey Decker, Jack French and Eming Shyu. elischolar.library.yale.edu
  4. Yale Program on Financial Stability / Journal of Financial Crises, "United States: Bear Stearns Emergency Liquidity Assistance, 2008". elischolar.library.yale.edu
  5. JPMorgan Chase & Co, Form 8-K press releases (acquisition of Bear Stearns Companies Inc.), 16 and 24 March 2008, filed with the SEC. sec.gov
  6. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, press release authorising up to $85bn Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility for AIG, 16 September 2008. federalreserve.gov
  7. US Department of the Treasury, "Overall Positive Return on $182 Billion AIG Commitment during Financial Crisis". home.treasury.gov
  8. Yale Program on Financial Stability / Journal of Financial Crises, "United States: Reserve Primary Fund Suspension, 2008". elischolar.library.yale.edu
  9. US Government Accountability Office, "Troubled Asset Relief Program: Lifetime Cost", GAO-24-107033. gao.gov
  10. S&P Dow Jones Indices, S&P CoreLogic Case-Shiller US National Home Price Index, series history via Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis FRED (CSUSHPINSA). fred.stlouisfed.org
Shanghai · China Course home Teaching CV
University of Oxford