Belgium v Egypt · Oxford Football Forecasting

🇧🇪 Belgium UEFA Elo 1,893 · world 18th

53 / 28 / 19 win · draw · win most likely 1–0

🇪🇬 Egypt CAF Elo 1,696 · world 40th

Group: G
Date: Monday 15 June 2026
Kick-off: 19:00 UTC
Venue: Seattle Stadium, Seattle

§ 01

The scoreline grid

The ensemble's full distribution over exact scorelines — Belgium goals down the side, Egypt goals across the top. This is the same 11×11 grid the tournament simulator samples.

Fig. V7 Ensemble · Group G

Belgium v Egypt — scoreline probabilities

Cells show P(exact scoreline); the right column and bottom row are the marginal totals P(Belgium scores k) and P(Egypt scores k). Grid runs 0–7 goals per side; the 8–10-goal tail holds 0.01% of the mass and is omitted from the cells (not from the totals).

The grid makes Belgium favourites at 52.9%, with a 28.5% draw. The single most-likely scoreline is 1–0 (14.8%), but no exact score clears 15% — the distribution is broad, as it should be.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

§ 02

Result, goals & totals

The grid marginalised into the outcome split, expected goals each side, and the goal-total markets — every figure read straight off the same distribution.

Win · draw · loss

52.9% 28.5% 18.6%

🇧🇪 Belgium 52.9% Draw 28.5% 🇪🇬 Egypt 18.6%

Rounded values sum to exactly 100%.

Expected goals (λ)

🇧🇪Belgium 1.47

🇪🇬Egypt 0.77

Poisson means feeding the grid; combined expected goals 2.23.

38.7% Over 2.5 goals P(3 or more goals in the match)

61.3% Under 2.5 goals complement of over-2.5

42.2% Both teams to score P(each side scores ≥ 1)

1–0 Most-likely scoreline modal exact score · 14.8%

§ 03

Venue context

The conditions at Seattle Stadium, Seattle — the same environment layer the dossiers' climate exposure draws on.

Lumen Seattle, USA

Heat index 23°C apparent temperature (June–July)

Max temperature 23°C June–July daily high

Humidity 69% relative humidity

Altitude 14m above sea level

Source · Open-Meteo & venue records. Travel and time-zone exposure are per-team — see each side's dossier.

§ 04

Why the model leans this way

The inputs behind the grid — each side's strength signals laid side by side. The forecast is the ensemble's, not a hand-weighting of these; this panel is the descriptive read.

1,893 Elo rating 1,696

2.07 Recent NT form 1.60

€613M Squad value €176M

0.173 Squad form (global) 0.158

0.718 Fitness readiness 0.661

+0.29 Decoupling g +0.25

Belgium carry the Elo edge (197 points). On the decoupling axis, Belgium is the side whose squad is valued higher relative to its record.

How a single-match forecast is built

The pairing is scored by the ensemble — Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled — yielding the 11×11 scoreline grid above. Win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over-2.5 and both-teams-to-score are all marginals of that one grid, so they are mutually consistent by construction. The strength inputs shown here feed the models; the forecast is their pooled output, not a manual weighting of these rows. The model matches the market out-of-sample (RPS 0.1891 vs 0.1905); it does not significantly beat it at n = 3. The ensemble, in full →