WC 2026 · Forecasting Oxford Football Forecasting
🇨🇦 Canada CONCACAF Elo 1,788 · world 25th
77 / 16 / 7 win · draw · win most likely 2–0
🇶🇦 Qatar AFC Elo 1,421 · world 115th
Group
B
Date
Thursday 18 June 2026
Kick-off
22:00 UTC
Venue
BC Place Vancouver, Vancouver

Fig. V7 Ensemble · Group B

Canada v Qatar — scoreline probabilities

0 Canada 0–0 Qatar · 5.79% 5.8 Canada 0–1 Qatar · 2.33% 2.3 Canada 0–2 Qatar · 0.84% 0.8 Canada 0–3 Qatar · 0.16% Canada 0–4 Qatar · 0.02% Canada 0–5 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 0–6 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 0–7 Qatar · 0.00% 9% 1 Canada 1–0 Qatar · 11.92% 12 Canada 1–1 Qatar · 7.64% 7.6 Canada 1–2 Qatar · 2.01% 2.0 Canada 1–3 Qatar · 0.38% Canada 1–4 Qatar · 0.05% Canada 1–5 Qatar · 0.01% Canada 1–6 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 1–7 Qatar · 0.00% 22% 2 Canada 2–0 Qatar · 14.86% (most likely) 15 Canada 2–1 Qatar · 8.43% 8.4 Canada 2–2 Qatar · 2.40% 2.4 Canada 2–3 Qatar · 0.45% Canada 2–4 Qatar · 0.06% Canada 2–5 Qatar · 0.01% Canada 2–6 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 2–7 Qatar · 0.00% 26% 3 Canada 3–0 Qatar · 11.81% 12 Canada 3–1 Qatar · 6.70% 6.7 Canada 3–2 Qatar · 1.90% 1.9 Canada 3–3 Qatar · 0.36% Canada 3–4 Qatar · 0.05% Canada 3–5 Qatar · 0.01% Canada 3–6 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 3–7 Qatar · 0.00% 21% 4 Canada 4–0 Qatar · 7.04% 7.0 Canada 4–1 Qatar · 4.00% 4.0 Canada 4–2 Qatar · 1.13% 1.1 Canada 4–3 Qatar · 0.21% Canada 4–4 Qatar · 0.03% Canada 4–5 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 4–6 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 4–7 Qatar · 0.00% 12% 5 Canada 5–0 Qatar · 3.36% 3.4 Canada 5–1 Qatar · 1.91% 1.9 Canada 5–2 Qatar · 0.54% 0.5 Canada 5–3 Qatar · 0.10% Canada 5–4 Qatar · 0.01% Canada 5–5 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 5–6 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 5–7 Qatar · 0.00% 6% 6 Canada 6–0 Qatar · 1.33% 1.3 Canada 6–1 Qatar · 0.76% 0.8 Canada 6–2 Qatar · 0.21% Canada 6–3 Qatar · 0.04% Canada 6–4 Qatar · 0.01% Canada 6–5 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 6–6 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 6–7 Qatar · 0.00% 2% 7 Canada 7–0 Qatar · 0.45% Canada 7–1 Qatar · 0.26% Canada 7–2 Qatar · 0.07% Canada 7–3 Qatar · 0.01% Canada 7–4 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 7–5 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 7–6 Qatar · 0.00% Canada 7–7 Qatar · 0.00% 1%

Cells show P(exact scoreline); the right column and bottom row are the marginal totals P(Canada scores k) and P(Qatar scores k). Grid runs 0–7 goals per side; the 8–10-goal tail holds 0.32% of the mass and is omitted from the cells (not from the totals).

The grid makes Canada favourites at 77.4%, with a 16.2% draw. The single most-likely scoreline is 2–0 (14.9%), but no exact score clears 15% — the distribution is broad, as it should be.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Win · draw · loss

🇨🇦 Canada 77.4% Draw 16.2% 🇶🇦 Qatar 6.4%

Rounded values sum to exactly 100%.

Expected goals (λ)

🇨🇦Canada 2.39
🇶🇦Qatar 0.57

Poisson means feeding the grid; combined expected goals 2.95.

56.6% Over 2.5 goals P(3 or more goals in the match)
43.4% Under 2.5 goals complement of over-2.5
39.9% Both teams to score P(each side scores ≥ 1)
2–0 Most-likely scoreline modal exact score · 14.9%
BC Place Vancouver, Canada
Heat index 21°C apparent temperature (June–July)
Max temperature 21°C June–July daily high
Humidity 74% relative humidity
Altitude 11m above sea level

Source · Open-Meteo & venue records. Travel and time-zone exposure are per-team — see each side's dossier.

1,788 Elo rating 1,421
1.73 Recent NT form 0.93
€201M Squad value €30M
0.293 Squad form (global) 0.052
0.669 Fitness readiness 0.330
+0.32 Decoupling g +0.74

Canada carry the Elo edge (367 points). On the decoupling axis, Qatar is the side whose squad is valued higher relative to its record.

How a single-match forecast is built

The pairing is scored by the ensemble — Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled — yielding the 11×11 scoreline grid above. Win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over-2.5 and both-teams-to-score are all marginals of that one grid, so they are mutually consistent by construction. The strength inputs shown here feed the models; the forecast is their pooled output, not a manual weighting of these rows. The model matches the market out-of-sample (RPS 0.1891 vs 0.1905); it does not significantly beat it at n = 3. The ensemble, in full →