WC 2026 · Forecasting Oxford Football Forecasting
🇺🇸 USA CONCACAF Elo 1,726
35 / 30 / 35 win · draw · win most likely 1–1
🇵🇾 Paraguay CONMEBOL Elo 1,833 · world 23rd
Group
D
Date
Saturday 13 June 2026
Kick-off
01:00 UTC
Venue
Los Angeles Stadium, Inglewood

Fig. V7 Ensemble · Group D

USA v Paraguay — scoreline probabilities

0 USA 0–0 Paraguay · 10.05% 10 USA 0–1 Paraguay · 9.73% 10 USA 0–2 Paraguay · 6.45% 6.4 USA 0–3 Paraguay · 2.57% 2.6 USA 0–4 Paraguay · 0.77% 0.8 USA 0–5 Paraguay · 0.18% USA 0–6 Paraguay · 0.04% USA 0–7 Paraguay · 0.01% 30% 1 USA 1–0 Paraguay · 9.81% 10 USA 1–1 Paraguay · 14.08% (most likely) 14 USA 1–2 Paraguay · 7.81% 7.8 USA 1–3 Paraguay · 3.12% 3.1 USA 1–4 Paraguay · 0.93% 0.9 USA 1–5 Paraguay · 0.22% USA 1–6 Paraguay · 0.04% USA 1–7 Paraguay · 0.01% 36% 2 USA 2–0 Paraguay · 6.60% 6.6 USA 2–1 Paraguay · 7.90% 7.9 USA 2–2 Paraguay · 4.73% 4.7 USA 2–3 Paraguay · 1.89% 1.9 USA 2–4 Paraguay · 0.57% 0.6 USA 2–5 Paraguay · 0.14% USA 2–6 Paraguay · 0.03% USA 2–7 Paraguay · 0.01% 22% 3 USA 3–0 Paraguay · 2.66% 2.7 USA 3–1 Paraguay · 3.19% 3.2 USA 3–2 Paraguay · 1.91% 1.9 USA 3–3 Paraguay · 0.76% 0.8 USA 3–4 Paraguay · 0.23% USA 3–5 Paraguay · 0.06% USA 3–6 Paraguay · 0.01% USA 3–7 Paraguay · 0.00% 9% 4 USA 4–0 Paraguay · 0.81% 0.8 USA 4–1 Paraguay · 0.97% 1.0 USA 4–2 Paraguay · 0.58% 0.6 USA 4–3 Paraguay · 0.23% USA 4–4 Paraguay · 0.07% USA 4–5 Paraguay · 0.02% USA 4–6 Paraguay · 0.00% USA 4–7 Paraguay · 0.00% 3% 5 USA 5–0 Paraguay · 0.20% USA 5–1 Paraguay · 0.23% USA 5–2 Paraguay · 0.14% USA 5–3 Paraguay · 0.06% USA 5–4 Paraguay · 0.02% USA 5–5 Paraguay · 0.00% USA 5–6 Paraguay · 0.00% USA 5–7 Paraguay · 0.00% 1% 6 USA 6–0 Paraguay · 0.04% USA 6–1 Paraguay · 0.05% USA 6–2 Paraguay · 0.03% USA 6–3 Paraguay · 0.01% USA 6–4 Paraguay · 0.00% USA 6–5 Paraguay · 0.00% USA 6–6 Paraguay · 0.00% USA 6–7 Paraguay · 0.00% 0% 7 USA 7–0 Paraguay · 0.01% USA 7–1 Paraguay · 0.01% USA 7–2 Paraguay · 0.01% USA 7–3 Paraguay · 0.00% USA 7–4 Paraguay · 0.00% USA 7–5 Paraguay · 0.00% USA 7–6 Paraguay · 0.00% USA 7–7 Paraguay · 0.00% 0%

Cells show P(exact scoreline); the right column and bottom row are the marginal totals P(USA scores k) and P(Paraguay scores k). Grid runs 0–7 goals per side; the 8–10-goal tail holds 0.01% of the mass and is omitted from the cells (not from the totals).

The grid makes USA favourites at 35.5%, with a 29.7% draw. The single most-likely scoreline is 1–1 (14.1%), but no exact score clears 14% — the distribution is broad, as it should be.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Win · draw · loss

🇺🇸 USA 35.5% Draw 29.7% 🇵🇾 Paraguay 34.8%

Rounded values sum to exactly 100%.

Expected goals (λ)

🇺🇸USA 1.21
🇵🇾Paraguay 1.20

Poisson means feeding the grid; combined expected goals 2.41.

43.3% Over 2.5 goals P(3 or more goals in the match)
56.7% Under 2.5 goals complement of over-2.5
50.1% Both teams to score P(each side scores ≥ 1)
1–1 Most-likely scoreline modal exact score · 14.1%
SoFi Inglewood, USA
Heat index 29°C apparent temperature (June–July)
Max temperature 27°C June–July daily high
Humidity 71% relative humidity
Altitude 45m above sea level

Source · Open-Meteo & venue records. Travel and time-zone exposure are per-team — see each side's dossier.

1,726 Elo rating 1,833
1.73 Recent NT form 1.67
€452M Squad value €152M
0.236 Squad form (global) 0.296
0.805 Fitness readiness 0.675
+0.43 Decoupling g −0.05

Paraguay carry the Elo edge (107 points). On the decoupling axis, USA is the side whose squad is valued higher relative to its record.

How a single-match forecast is built

The pairing is scored by the ensemble — Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled — yielding the 11×11 scoreline grid above. Win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over-2.5 and both-teams-to-score are all marginals of that one grid, so they are mutually consistent by construction. The strength inputs shown here feed the models; the forecast is their pooled output, not a manual weighting of these rows. The model matches the market out-of-sample (RPS 0.1891 vs 0.1905); it does not significantly beat it at n = 3. The ensemble, in full →