Ecuador
- Coach
- Sebastián Beccacece foreign · Argentine
- Elo (model)
- 1,938 world 8th
- Squad value
- €290M
- Power → Reality
- 12th 13th −0.04 pp · neutral draw
§ 01
The forecast
How far Ecuador goes — the survival probability at each stage of the bracket, from the tournament Monte-Carlo simulation. Each bar carries its ±1.96·MC-SE interval.
Fig. D1 Fixture-aware · 100k sims
Ecuador — stage progression
On the central forecast, Ecuador more likely than not reaches the Round of 16 (51%). Champion probability is 1.9% ± 0.04 pts.
§ 02
The group & the path
Group E advancement odds, the bracket half Ecuador sits in, and the earliest round they could meet each leading side.
| Group E | Confed | Advance (top 2) | Reach R32 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇩🇪Germany | UEFA | 62.5% | 98.1% |
| 2 | 🇪🇨Ecuador | CONMEBOL | 50.7% | 93.3% |
| 3 | 🇨🇮Côte d'Ivoire | CAF | 31.8% | 80.2% |
| 4 | 🇨🇼Curaçao | CONCACAF | 0.4% | 5.2% |
Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model
Earliest possible meetings
No collision rows recorded for this team.
Collision = the earliest round the bracket wiring could pit Ecuador against that side. Full bracket & collision matrix →
§ 03
Match by match
Ecuador's three group fixtures, each with the predicted win / draw / loss split and the single most-likely scoreline. Probabilities are this team's own orientation; they sum to 100%.
How a match forecast is built
Each pairing is scored by the ensemble (Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled), producing an 11×11 scoreline grid that is marginalised into win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over/under 2.5 and both-teams-to-score. These are the same distributions the tournament simulator consumes, oriented here to Ecuador. Knockout fixtures are not shown — their occupants are still probabilistic, so there is no single pairing to forecast yet.
§ 04
Strength profile
Where Ecuador stands against the median of the 48-team field, metric by metric. The dot is Ecuador; the dashed line is the field median (1.0×).
Fig. D2 Relative to the 48-team median
Ecuador vs the field
Read each row as a multiple of the field median: dots to the right of the dashed line are above-field, to the left below. Raw values are labelled on the right so the comparison is transparent.
§ 05
History vs squad
The decoupling residual g — whether the squad’s market value sits above, or below, what the team’s record predicts.
Fig. D3 Bayesian projection residual g
Ecuador on the decoupling axis
g = −0.55 ± 0.06: the record outruns the squad price — the team has achieved more than its comparatively modest squad value would predict.
What g means — and its limits
g is the residual from regressing a team’s current squad market value on its
history-based strength in the Bayesian hierarchical model. Positive g
means the squad is valued above what the team’s record predicts; negative means the
record outruns the squad’s price (the side achieves more than its market value implies).
Regressed on out-of-sample success the slope is positive — squad-rich sides go a touch
further — but not statistically significant at n = 3 tournaments, so treat
a single team’s g as a descriptive read, not a hard prediction.
The full decoupling essay →
§ 06
The squad
All 26 selected players — club, league (with relative strength), club-season minutes and goals, caps. Sort any column.
| # | Player | Pos | Club | League | Club min | Gls | Caps | NT gls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hernán Galíndez | GK | Huracán | Copa Argentina +0.10z | 6,898 | 0 | 35 | 0 |
| 2 | Félix Torres | DF | Internacional | — | — no club data | — | 49 | 5 |
| 3 | Piero Hincapié | DF | Arsenal | Premier League +2.21z | 2,763 | 1 | 52 | 3 |
| 4 | Joel Ordóñez | DF | Club Brugge | Jupiler Pro League −0.07z | 3,760 | 5 | 17 | 0 |
| 5 | Jordy Alcívar | MF | Independiente del Valle | Liga Pro −0.72z | 3,069 | 3 | 11 | 1 |
| 6 | Willian Pacho | DF | Paris Saint-Germain | Ligue 1 +1.70z | 4,108 | 2 | 34 | 2 |
| 7 | Pervis Estupiñán | DF | Milan | — | — no club data | — | 54 | 5 |
| 8 | Anthony Valencia | MF | Antwerp | Jupiler Pro League −0.07z | 1,331 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| 9 | John Yeboah | FW | Venezia | Serie B +1.70z | 2,716 | 12 | 23 | 3 |
| 10 | Kendry Páez | MF | River Plate | — | — no club data | — | 26 | 2 |
| 11 | Kevin Rodríguez | FW | Union Saint-Gilloise | Jupiler Pro League −0.07z | 2,939 | 11 | 31 | 2 |
| 12 | Moisés Ramírez | GK | Kifisia | Super League 1 +0.03z | 2,520 | 0 | 7 | 0 |
| 13 | Enner Valencia (captain) | FW | Pachuca | Liga MX +0.22z | 1,376 | 8 | 105 | 49 |
| 14 | Alan Minda | MF | Atlético Mineiro | — | — no club data | — | 20 | 2 |
| 15 | Pedro Vite | MF | UNAM | — | — no club data | — | 17 | 1 |
| 16 | Jordy Caicedo | FW | Huracán | — | — no club data | — | 20 | 4 |
| 17 | Ángelo Preciado | DF | Atlético Mineiro | — | — no club data | — | 55 | 0 |
| 18 | Denil Castillo | MF | Midtjylland | Superliga −0.53z | 2,374 | 4 | 5 | 0 |
| 19 | Gonzalo Plata | FW | Flamengo | Serie A +1.03z | 3,321 | 9 | 50 | 8 |
| 20 | Nilson Angulo | FW | Sunderland | Premier League +2.21z | 503 | 0 | 14 | 2 |
| 21 | Alan Franco | MF | Atlético Mineiro | — | — no club data | — | 58 | 1 |
| 22 | Gonzalo Valle | GK | LDU Quito | Liga Pro −0.72z | 1,751 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| 23 | Moisés Caicedo | MF | Chelsea | Premier League +2.21z | 5,125 | 5 | 61 | 3 |
| 24 | Jeremy Arévalo | FW | VfB Stuttgart | Bundesliga +1.84z | 59 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| 25 | Jackson Porozo | DF | Tijuana | Liga MX +0.22z | 3,486 | 4 | 10 | 1 |
| 26 | Yaimar Medina | DF | Genk | Jupiler Pro League −0.07z | 2,119 | 1 | 6 | 0 |
Source · Official squad announcements · API-Football (global club coverage). 8 of 26 players have no club season matched in API-Football — shown as “— no club data”, not imputed. Form coverage for this squad: 69%.
§ 07
Tournament context
The host-nation environment this team meets — diaspora support, climate and altitude exposure at their venues, language familiarity.
Diaspora in the hosts
444,906
25.0 per 1,000 of home population
Host-language familiarity
Shared
primary language Spanish · spoken in a host
Climate adaptation gap
+5.1°C
home-vs-venue heat differential
Venue extremes
37°C
peak heat index · altitude up to 273 m
Travel
1h
max time-zone shift · nearest venue 2,917 km
Source · UN DESA international migrant stock · US Census Bureau · Open-Meteo & venue records
§ 08
Elo trajectory
Ecuador's long-run strength against the qualified-field median, 1953–2026.
Fig. D4 eloratings.net method · year-end values
Ecuador — Elo since 1953
Ecuador ends the series at 2028 Elo, the world’s 8th-ranked side — above the qualified-field median.
Which Elo is this?
This line is the public eloratings.net series (year-end ratings), which terminates exactly at the current rating and world rank shown on the marker. It is a different number from the Elo shown in the header band (a panel-normalised rating used inside the forecast); the two are ~0.99 correlated but on different scales. We keep them distinct rather than blend them.
§ 09
Data coverage
Validated on n=3 held-out tournaments; coverage below 1.0 means part of this squad's club-form/fitness is imputed (the global de-biasing layer). For Ecuador, 8 of 26 players are shown as “— no club data”. Full validation, calibration & conformal coverage →