IR Iran
- Coach
- Amir Ghalenoei home · Iranian
- Elo (model)
- 1,772
- Squad value
- €63M
- Power → Reality
- 23rd 23rd +0.11 pp · neutral draw
§ 01
The forecast
How far IR Iran goes — the survival probability at each stage of the bracket, from the tournament Monte-Carlo simulation. Each bar carries its ±1.96·MC-SE interval.
Fig. D1 Fixture-aware · 100k sims
IR Iran — stage progression
On the central forecast, IR Iran more likely than not reaches the Round of 32 (79%). Champion probability is 0.4% ± 0.02 pts.
§ 02
The group & the path
Group G advancement odds, the bracket half IR Iran sits in, and the earliest round they could meet each leading side.
| Group G | Confed | Advance (top 2) | Reach R32 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 🇧🇪Belgium | UEFA | 61.9% | 93.9% |
| 2 | 🇮🇷IR Iran | AFC | 39.5% | 79.4% |
| 3 | 🇪🇬Egypt | CAF | 28.1% | 67.6% |
| 4 | 🇳🇿New Zealand | OFC | 6.0% | 27.6% |
Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model
Earliest possible meetings
No collision rows recorded for this team.
Collision = the earliest round the bracket wiring could pit IR Iran against that side. Full bracket & collision matrix →
§ 03
Match by match
IR Iran's three group fixtures, each with the predicted win / draw / loss split and the single most-likely scoreline. Probabilities are this team's own orientation; they sum to 100%.
How a match forecast is built
Each pairing is scored by the ensemble (Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled), producing an 11×11 scoreline grid that is marginalised into win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over/under 2.5 and both-teams-to-score. These are the same distributions the tournament simulator consumes, oriented here to IR Iran. Knockout fixtures are not shown — their occupants are still probabilistic, so there is no single pairing to forecast yet.
§ 04
Strength profile
Where IR Iran stands against the median of the 48-team field, metric by metric. The dot is IR Iran; the dashed line is the field median (1.0×).
Fig. D2 Relative to the 48-team median
IR Iran vs the field
Read each row as a multiple of the field median: dots to the right of the dashed line are above-field, to the left below. Raw values are labelled on the right so the comparison is transparent.
§ 05
History vs squad
The decoupling residual g — whether the squad’s market value sits above, or below, what the team’s record predicts.
Fig. D3 Bayesian projection residual g
IR Iran on the decoupling axis
g = +0.01 ± 0.05: squad market value and recent record are closely aligned.
What g means — and its limits
g is the residual from regressing a team’s current squad market value on its
history-based strength in the Bayesian hierarchical model. Positive g
means the squad is valued above what the team’s record predicts; negative means the
record outruns the squad’s price (the side achieves more than its market value implies).
Regressed on out-of-sample success the slope is positive — squad-rich sides go a touch
further — but not statistically significant at n = 3 tournaments, so treat
a single team’s g as a descriptive read, not a hard prediction.
The full decoupling essay →
§ 06
The squad
All 26 selected players — club, league (with relative strength), club-season minutes and goals, caps. Sort any column.
| # | Player | Pos | Club | League | Club min | Gls | Caps | NT gls |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alireza Beiranvand | GK | Tractor | Persian Gulf Pro League −0.98z | 772 | 0 | 86 | 0 |
| 2 | Saleh Hardani | DF | Esteghlal | AFC Champions League Two −0.05z | 448 | 0 | 18 | 1 |
| 3 | Ehsan Hajsafi (captain) | DF | Sepahan | — | — no club data | — | 146 | 7 |
| 4 | Shojae Khalilzadeh | DF | Tractor | AFC Champions League Elite −0.05z | 805 | 1 | 58 | 2 |
| 5 | Milad Mohammadi | DF | Persepolis | Persian Gulf Pro League −0.98z | 422 | 0 | 76 | 1 |
| 6 | Saeid Ezatolahi | MF | Shabab Al Ahli | — | — no club data | — | 83 | 2 |
| 7 | Alireza Jahanbakhsh | MF | Dender | Jupiler Pro League −0.07z | 907 | 1 | 98 | 17 |
| 8 | Mohammad Mohebi | MF | Rostov | Premier League +0.27z | 1,619 | 3 | 36 | 14 |
| 9 | Mehdi Taremi | FW | Olympiacos | — | — no club data | — | 105 | 60 |
| 10 | Mehdi Ghayedi | FW | Al Nasr | — | — no club data | — | 30 | 10 |
| 11 | Ali Alipour | FW | Persepolis | — | — no club data | — | 14 | 1 |
| 12 | Payam Niazmand | GK | Persepolis | — | — no club data | — | 15 | 0 |
| 13 | Hossein Kanaanizadegan | DF | Persepolis | — | — no club data | — | 65 | 6 |
| 14 | Saman Ghoddos | MF | Kalba | Pro League −0.09z | 2,286 | 7 | 68 | 3 |
| 15 | Rouzbeh Cheshmi | MF | Esteghlal | AFC Champions League Two −0.05z | 90 | 0 | 40 | 3 |
| 16 | Mehdi Torabi | MF | Tractor | Persian Gulf Pro League −0.98z | 314 | 1 | 52 | 7 |
| 17 | Aria Yousefi | DF | Sepahan | Persian Gulf Pro League −0.98z | 405 | 1 | 14 | 1 |
| 18 | Amirhossein Hosseinzadeh | FW | Tractor | Persian Gulf Pro League −0.98z | 2,363 | 9 | 18 | 5 |
| 19 | Ali Nemati | DF | Foolad | — | — no club data | — | 17 | 0 |
| 20 | Shahriyar Moghanlou | FW | Kalba | Pro League −0.09z | 2,512 | 13 | 21 | 2 |
| 21 | Mohammad Ghorbani | MF | Al Wahda | — | — no club data | — | 16 | 0 |
| 22 | Hossein Hosseini | GK | Sepahan | Persian Gulf Pro League −0.98z | 450 | 0 | 13 | 0 |
| 23 | Ramin Rezaeian | DF | Foolad | Persian Gulf Pro League −0.98z | 0 | 0 | 74 | 8 |
| 24 | Dennis Eckert | FW | Standard Liège | Jupiler Pro League −0.07z | 1,987 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | Danial Eiri | DF | Malavan | — | — no club data | — | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | Amirmohammad Razzaghinia | MF | Esteghlal | Persian Gulf Pro League −0.98z | 443 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
Source · Official squad announcements · API-Football (global club coverage). 10 of 26 players have no club season matched in API-Football — shown as “— no club data”, not imputed. Form coverage for this squad: 58%.
§ 07
Tournament context
The host-nation environment this team meets — diaspora support, climate and altitude exposure at their venues, language familiarity.
Diaspora in the hosts
553,852
6.0 per 1,000 of home population
Host-language familiarity
Foreign
primary language Persian (Farsi)
Climate adaptation gap
−0.7°C
home-vs-venue heat differential
Venue extremes
29°C
peak heat index · altitude up to 45 m
Travel
11h
max time-zone shift · nearest venue 9,589 km
Source · UN DESA international migrant stock · US Census Bureau · Open-Meteo & venue records
§ 08
Elo trajectory
IR Iran's long-run strength against the qualified-field median, 1950–2026.
Fig. D4 eloratings.net method · year-end values
IR Iran — Elo since 1950
IR Iran ends the series at 1897 Elo, the world’s 26th-ranked side — above the qualified-field median.
Which Elo is this?
This line is the public eloratings.net series (year-end ratings), which terminates exactly at the current rating and world rank shown on the marker. It is a different number from the Elo shown in the header band (a panel-normalised rating used inside the forecast); the two are ~0.99 correlated but on different scales. We keep them distinct rather than blend them.
§ 09
Data coverage
Validated on n=3 held-out tournaments; coverage below 1.0 means part of this squad's club-form/fitness is imputed (the global de-biasing layer). For IR Iran, 10 of 26 players are shown as “— no club data”. Full validation, calibration & conformal coverage →