WC 2026 · Forecasting Oxford Football Forecasting
🇵🇾

Paraguay

CONMEBOL Group D
0.5% Champion probability ±0.02 MC-SE
Coach
Gustavo Alfaro foreign · Argentine
Elo (model)
1,833 world 23rd
Squad value
€152M
Power → Reality
21st 21st −0.01 pp · neutral draw

Fig. D1 Fixture-aware · 100k sims

Paraguay — stage progression

Round of 32: 69.17% (95% MC 68.88%–69.46%; MC-SE ±0.15 pts) Round of 32 reach 69.2% ±0.15 Round of 16: 35.59% (95% MC 35.30%–35.89%; MC-SE ±0.15 pts) Round of 16 reach 35.6% ±0.15 Quarter-final: 14.03% (95% MC 13.82%–14.25%; MC-SE ±0.11 pts) Quarter-final reach 14.0% ±0.11 Semi-final: 4.92% (95% MC 4.79%–5.06%; MC-SE ±0.07 pts) Semi-final reach 4.9% ±0.07 Final: 1.71% (95% MC 1.63%–1.79%; MC-SE ±0.04 pts) Final reach 1.7% ±0.04 Champion: 0.54% (95% MC 0.49%–0.58%; MC-SE ±0.02 pts) Champion reach 0.5% ±0.02

On the central forecast, Paraguay more likely than not reaches the Round of 32 (69%). Champion probability is 0.5% ± 0.02 pts.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model
Group D Confed Advance (top 2) Reach R32
1🇹🇷TürkiyeUEFA43.7%76.7%
2🇵🇾ParaguayCONMEBOL35.6%69.2%
3🇺🇸USACONCACAF29.4%67.2%
4🇦🇺AustraliaAFC28.6%61.3%

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Bracket position Half 0 · Quadrant 1

Earliest possible meetings

No collision rows recorded for this team.

Collision = the earliest round the bracket wiring could pit Paraguay against that side. Full bracket & collision matrix →

Match 4 · 2026-06-13 · Los Angeles Stadium away
Paraguay USA
34.8% win 29.7% draw 35.5% loss
Most likely 1–1 (14.1%) λ 1.20–1.21 Over 2.5 43% · BTTS 50%
Match 31 · 2026-06-20 · San Francisco Bay Area Stadium away
Paraguay Türkiye
31% win 31.3% draw 37.7% loss
Most likely 1–1 (14.4%) λ 1.02–1.16 Over 2.5 37% · BTTS 45%
Match 60 · 2026-06-26 · San Francisco Bay Area Stadium home
Paraguay Australia
37.5% win 34.4% draw 28.1% loss
Most likely 0–0 (17.0%) λ 1.01–0.83 Over 2.5 28% · BTTS 37%
How a match forecast is built

Each pairing is scored by the ensemble (Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled), producing an 11×11 scoreline grid that is marginalised into win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over/under 2.5 and both-teams-to-score. These are the same distributions the tournament simulator consumes, oriented here to Paraguay. Knockout fixtures are not shown — their occupants are still probabilistic, so there is no single pairing to forecast yet.

Fig. D2 Relative to the 48-team median

Paraguay vs the field

Elo rating: 1833 vs field median 1780 (1.03× the field) Elo rating 1833 med 1780 Recent NT form: 1.67 ppg vs field median 1.87 ppg (0.89× the field) Recent NT form 1.67 ppg med 1.87 ppg Squad value: €152M vs field median €286M (0.53× the field) Squad value €152M med €286M Squad form (global): 0.296 vs field median 0.211 (1.40× the field) Squad form (global) 0.296 med 0.211 Fitness readiness: 0.675 vs field median 0.707 (0.95× the field) Fitness readiness 0.675 med 0.707 Familiarity / chemistry: 0.015 vs field median 0.015 (1.00× the field) Familiarity / chemistry 0.015 med 0.015 Experience (mean caps): 25 vs field median 25 (0.99× the field) Experience (mean caps) 25 med 25

Read each row as a multiple of the field median: dots to the right of the dashed line are above-field, to the left below. Raw values are labelled on the right so the comparison is transparent.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Fig. D3 Bayesian projection residual g

Paraguay on the decoupling axis

aligned (0) ← record > squad price squad valued > record →

g = −0.05 ± 0.05: squad market value and recent record are closely aligned.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model
What g means — and its limits

g is the residual from regressing a team’s current squad market value on its history-based strength in the Bayesian hierarchical model. Positive g means the squad is valued above what the team’s record predicts; negative means the record outruns the squad’s price (the side achieves more than its market value implies). Regressed on out-of-sample success the slope is positive — squad-rich sides go a touch further — but not statistically significant at n = 3 tournaments, so treat a single team’s g as a descriptive read, not a hard prediction. The full decoupling essay →

26players
26.2mean age
25mean caps
27%in a top-5 league
22distinct clubs
3largest club bloc
# Player Pos Club League Club min Gls Caps NT gls
1Gatito FernándezGKCerro PorteñoDivision Profesional - Apertura5400310
2Gustavo VelázquezDFCerro PorteñoDivision Profesional - Apertura2,3991131
3Omar AldereteDFSunderlandPremier League +2.21z2,8921363
4Juan José CáceresDFDynamo MoscowPremier League +0.27z2,0651170
5Fabián BalbuenaDFGrêmioSerie A +1.03z2341482
6Júnior AlonsoDFAtlético Mineirono club data713
7Ramón SosaMFPalmeirasSerie A +1.03z1,1504291
8Diego GómezMFBrighton & Hove AlbionPremier League +2.21z2,48510243
9Antonio SanabriaFWCremoneseSerie A +1.70z9401487
10Miguel AlmirónMFAtlanta United FCMajor League Soccer −0.71z2,80367610
11MaurícioMFPalmeirasSerie A +1.03z2,8841030
12Orlando GillGKSan Lorenzono club data60
13José CanaleDFLanúsLiga Profesional Argentina +0.10z1,594420
14Andrés CubasMFVancouver Whitecaps FCMajor League Soccer −0.71z2,9660330
15Gustavo Gómez (captain)DFPalmeirasSerie A +1.03z4,5106894
16Damián BobadillaMFSão PauloSerie A +1.03z2,8784191
17KakuFWAl Ainno club data336
18Álex ArceFWIndependiente Rivadaviano club data151
19Julio EncisoFWStrasbourgLigue 1 +1.70z2,96612324
20Braian OjedaMFOrlando City SCMajor League Soccer −0.71z4,79624170
21Gabriel ÁvalosFWIndependienteCopa Argentina +0.10z4,75128232
22Gastón OlveiraGKOlimpiaDivision Profesional - Apertura927010
23Matías GalarzaMFAtlanta United FCno club data153
24Gustavo CaballeroMFPortsmouthChampionship +2.21z761121
25Isidro PittaFWRed Bull BragantinoSerie A +1.03z1,796950
26Alexandro MaidanaDFTalleresno club data21

Source · Official squad announcements · API-Football (global club coverage). 6 of 26 players have no club season matched in API-Football — shown as “— no club data”, not imputed. Form coverage for this squad: 77%.

Diaspora in the hosts

54,608

8.0 per 1,000 of home population

Host-language familiarity

Shared

primary language Guaraní · spoken in a host

Climate adaptation gap

+2.6°C

home-vs-venue heat differential

Venue extremes

29°C

peak heat index · altitude up to 45 m

Travel

4h

max time-zone shift · nearest venue 6,195 km

Source · UN DESA international migrant stock · US Census Bureau · Open-Meteo & venue records

Fig. D4 eloratings.net method · year-end values

Paraguay — Elo since 1950

1918 world #23
Paraguay Qualified-field median

Paraguay ends the series at 1918 Elo, the world’s 23rd-ranked side — above the qualified-field median.

Source · eloratings.net
Which Elo is this?

This line is the public eloratings.net series (year-end ratings), which terminates exactly at the current rating and world rank shown on the marker. It is a different number from the Elo shown in the header band (a panel-normalised rating used inside the forecast); the two are ~0.99 correlated but on different scales. We keep them distinct rather than blend them.

77% Squad club-form coverage Share of this squad with a matched club season feeding the global form layer.
77% Fitness-readiness coverage Where below 100%, part of the fitness signal is imputed by the de-biasing layer.
n = 3 Out-of-sample tournaments The model is validated on three held-out World Cups; it matches the market, it does not beat it.

Validated on n=3 held-out tournaments; coverage below 1.0 means part of this squad's club-form/fitness is imputed (the global de-biasing layer). For Paraguay, 6 of 26 players are shown as “— no club data”. Full validation, calibration & conformal coverage →