WC 2026 · Forecasting Oxford Football Forecasting
🇺🇸 USA CONCACAF Elo 1,726
39 / 29 / 32 win · draw · win most likely 1–1
🇦🇺 Australia AFC Elo 1,777 · world 24th
Group
D
Date
Friday 19 June 2026
Kick-off
19:00 UTC
Venue
Seattle Stadium, Seattle

Fig. V7 Ensemble · Group D

USA v Australia — scoreline probabilities

0 USA 0–0 Australia · 9.42% 9.4 USA 0–1 Australia · 8.80% 8.8 USA 0–2 Australia · 5.76% 5.8 USA 0–3 Australia · 2.25% 2.3 USA 0–4 Australia · 0.66% 0.7 USA 0–5 Australia · 0.15% USA 0–6 Australia · 0.03% USA 0–7 Australia · 0.01% 27% 1 USA 1–0 Australia · 9.87% 10 USA 1–1 Australia · 13.86% (most likely) 14 USA 1–2 Australia · 7.53% 7.5 USA 1–3 Australia · 2.95% 2.9 USA 1–4 Australia · 0.86% 0.9 USA 1–5 Australia · 0.20% USA 1–6 Australia · 0.04% USA 1–7 Australia · 0.01% 35% 2 USA 2–0 Australia · 7.15% 7.2 USA 2–1 Australia · 8.39% 8.4 USA 2–2 Australia · 4.92% 4.9 USA 2–3 Australia · 1.93% 1.9 USA 2–4 Australia · 0.56% 0.6 USA 2–5 Australia · 0.13% USA 2–6 Australia · 0.03% USA 2–7 Australia · 0.00% 23% 3 USA 3–0 Australia · 3.12% 3.1 USA 3–1 Australia · 3.66% 3.7 USA 3–2 Australia · 2.15% 2.1 USA 3–3 Australia · 0.84% 0.8 USA 3–4 Australia · 0.25% USA 3–5 Australia · 0.06% USA 3–6 Australia · 0.01% USA 3–7 Australia · 0.00% 10% 4 USA 4–0 Australia · 1.02% 1.0 USA 4–1 Australia · 1.20% 1.2 USA 4–2 Australia · 0.70% 0.7 USA 4–3 Australia · 0.27% USA 4–4 Australia · 0.08% USA 4–5 Australia · 0.02% USA 4–6 Australia · 0.00% USA 4–7 Australia · 0.00% 3% 5 USA 5–0 Australia · 0.27% USA 5–1 Australia · 0.31% USA 5–2 Australia · 0.18% USA 5–3 Australia · 0.07% USA 5–4 Australia · 0.02% USA 5–5 Australia · 0.01% USA 5–6 Australia · 0.00% USA 5–7 Australia · 0.00% 1% 6 USA 6–0 Australia · 0.06% USA 6–1 Australia · 0.07% USA 6–2 Australia · 0.04% USA 6–3 Australia · 0.02% USA 6–4 Australia · 0.01% USA 6–5 Australia · 0.00% USA 6–6 Australia · 0.00% USA 6–7 Australia · 0.00% 0% 7 USA 7–0 Australia · 0.01% USA 7–1 Australia · 0.01% USA 7–2 Australia · 0.01% USA 7–3 Australia · 0.00% USA 7–4 Australia · 0.00% USA 7–5 Australia · 0.00% USA 7–6 Australia · 0.00% USA 7–7 Australia · 0.00% 0%

Cells show P(exact scoreline); the right column and bottom row are the marginal totals P(USA scores k) and P(Australia scores k). Grid runs 0–7 goals per side; the 8–10-goal tail holds 0.01% of the mass and is omitted from the cells (not from the totals).

The grid makes USA favourites at 38.6%, with a 29.1% draw. The single most-likely scoreline is 1–1 (13.9%), but no exact score clears 14% — the distribution is broad, as it should be.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Win · draw · loss

🇺🇸 USA 38.6% Draw 29.1% 🇦🇺 Australia 32.3%

Rounded values sum to exactly 100%.

Expected goals (λ)

🇺🇸USA 1.31
🇦🇺Australia 1.17

Poisson means feeding the grid; combined expected goals 2.48.

45.1% Over 2.5 goals P(3 or more goals in the match)
54.9% Under 2.5 goals complement of over-2.5
51.4% Both teams to score P(each side scores ≥ 1)
1–1 Most-likely scoreline modal exact score · 13.9%
Lumen Seattle, USA
Heat index 23°C apparent temperature (June–July)
Max temperature 23°C June–July daily high
Humidity 69% relative humidity
Altitude 14m above sea level

Source · Open-Meteo & venue records. Travel and time-zone exposure are per-team — see each side's dossier.

1,726 Elo rating 1,777
1.73 Recent NT form 1.93
€452M Squad value €55M
0.236 Squad form (global) 0.087
0.805 Fitness readiness 0.616
+0.43 Decoupling g −0.72

Australia carry the Elo edge (51 points). On the decoupling axis, USA is the side whose squad is valued higher relative to its record.

How a single-match forecast is built

The pairing is scored by the ensemble — Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled — yielding the 11×11 scoreline grid above. Win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over-2.5 and both-teams-to-score are all marginals of that one grid, so they are mutually consistent by construction. The strength inputs shown here feed the models; the forecast is their pooled output, not a manual weighting of these rows. The model matches the market out-of-sample (RPS 0.1891 vs 0.1905); it does not significantly beat it at n = 3. The ensemble, in full →