WC 2026 · Forecasting Oxford Football Forecasting
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England UEFA Elo 2,021 · world 4th
75 / 19 / 6 win · draw · win most likely 2–0
🇬🇭 Ghana CAF Elo 1,510 · world 94th
Group
L
Date
Tuesday 23 June 2026
Kick-off
20:00 UTC
Venue
Boston Stadium, Foxborough

Fig. V7 Ensemble · Group L

England v Ghana — scoreline probabilities

0 England 0–0 Ghana · 9.07% 9.1 England 0–1 Ghana · 3.12% 3.1 England 0–2 Ghana · 0.83% 0.8 England 0–3 Ghana · 0.12% England 0–4 Ghana · 0.01% England 0–5 Ghana · 0.00% England 0–6 Ghana · 0.00% England 0–7 Ghana · 0.00% 13% 1 England 1–0 Ghana · 16.57% 17 England 1–1 Ghana · 8.19% 8.2 England 1–2 Ghana · 1.68% 1.7 England 1–3 Ghana · 0.25% England 1–4 Ghana · 0.03% England 1–5 Ghana · 0.00% England 1–6 Ghana · 0.00% England 1–7 Ghana · 0.00% 27% 2 England 2–0 Ghana · 17.39% (most likely) 17 England 2–1 Ghana · 7.69% 7.7 England 2–2 Ghana · 1.70% 1.7 England 2–3 Ghana · 0.25% England 2–4 Ghana · 0.03% England 2–5 Ghana · 0.00% England 2–6 Ghana · 0.00% England 2–7 Ghana · 0.00% 27% 3 England 3–0 Ghana · 11.75% 12 England 3–1 Ghana · 5.20% 5.2 England 3–2 Ghana · 1.15% 1.1 England 3–3 Ghana · 0.17% England 3–4 Ghana · 0.02% England 3–5 Ghana · 0.00% England 3–6 Ghana · 0.00% England 3–7 Ghana · 0.00% 18% 4 England 4–0 Ghana · 5.95% 6.0 England 4–1 Ghana · 2.63% 2.6 England 4–2 Ghana · 0.58% 0.6 England 4–3 Ghana · 0.09% England 4–4 Ghana · 0.01% England 4–5 Ghana · 0.00% England 4–6 Ghana · 0.00% England 4–7 Ghana · 0.00% 9% 5 England 5–0 Ghana · 2.41% 2.4 England 5–1 Ghana · 1.07% 1.1 England 5–2 Ghana · 0.24% England 5–3 Ghana · 0.03% England 5–4 Ghana · 0.00% England 5–5 Ghana · 0.00% England 5–6 Ghana · 0.00% England 5–7 Ghana · 0.00% 4% 6 England 6–0 Ghana · 0.81% 0.8 England 6–1 Ghana · 0.36% England 6–2 Ghana · 0.08% England 6–3 Ghana · 0.01% England 6–4 Ghana · 0.00% England 6–5 Ghana · 0.00% England 6–6 Ghana · 0.00% England 6–7 Ghana · 0.00% 1% 7 England 7–0 Ghana · 0.24% England 7–1 Ghana · 0.10% England 7–2 Ghana · 0.02% England 7–3 Ghana · 0.00% England 7–4 Ghana · 0.00% England 7–5 Ghana · 0.00% England 7–6 Ghana · 0.00% England 7–7 Ghana · 0.00% 0%

Cells show P(exact scoreline); the right column and bottom row are the marginal totals P(England scores k) and P(Ghana scores k). Grid runs 0–7 goals per side; the 8–10-goal tail holds 0.12% of the mass and is omitted from the cells (not from the totals).

The grid makes England favourites at 74.5%, with a 19.1% draw. The single most-likely scoreline is 2–0 (17.4%), but no exact score clears 17% — the distribution is broad, as it should be.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Win · draw · loss

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England 74.5% Draw 19.1% 🇬🇭 Ghana 6.4%

Rounded values sum to exactly 100%.

Expected goals (λ)

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿England 2.03
🇬🇭Ghana 0.44

Poisson means feeding the grid; combined expected goals 2.47.

44.8% Over 2.5 goals P(3 or more goals in the match)
55.2% Under 2.5 goals complement of over-2.5
31.6% Both teams to score P(each side scores ≥ 1)
2–0 Most-likely scoreline modal exact score · 17.4%
Gillette Foxborough, USA
Heat index 29°C apparent temperature (June–July)
Max temperature 27°C June–July daily high
Humidity 74% relative humidity
Altitude 83m above sea level

Source · Open-Meteo & venue records. Travel and time-zone exposure are per-team — see each side's dossier.

2,021 Elo rating 1,510
2.47 Recent NT form 1.33
€1878M Squad value €291M
0.410 Squad form (global) 0.187
0.807 Fitness readiness 0.689
−0.01 Decoupling g +0.34

England carry the Elo edge (511 points). On the decoupling axis, Ghana is the side whose squad is valued higher relative to its record.

How a single-match forecast is built

The pairing is scored by the ensemble — Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled — yielding the 11×11 scoreline grid above. Win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over-2.5 and both-teams-to-score are all marginals of that one grid, so they are mutually consistent by construction. The strength inputs shown here feed the models; the forecast is their pooled output, not a manual weighting of these rows. The model matches the market out-of-sample (RPS 0.1891 vs 0.1905); it does not significantly beat it at n = 3. The ensemble, in full →