WC 2026 · Forecasting Oxford Football Forecasting
🇪🇬 Egypt CAF Elo 1,696 · world 40th
27 / 33 / 40 win · draw · win most likely 0–0
🇮🇷 IR Iran AFC Elo 1,772
Group
G
Date
Saturday 27 June 2026
Kick-off
03:00 UTC
Venue
Seattle Stadium, Seattle

Fig. V7 Ensemble · Group G

Egypt v IR Iran — scoreline probabilities

0 Egypt 0–0 IR Iran · 14.65% (most likely) 15 Egypt 0–1 IR Iran · 14.08% 14 Egypt 0–2 IR Iran · 8.45% 8.5 Egypt 0–3 IR Iran · 3.15% 3.1 Egypt 0–4 IR Iran · 0.88% 0.9 Egypt 0–5 IR Iran · 0.20% Egypt 0–6 IR Iran · 0.04% Egypt 0–7 IR Iran · 0.01% 41% 1 Egypt 1–0 IR Iran · 10.85% 11 Egypt 1–1 IR Iran · 14.41% 14 Egypt 1–2 IR Iran · 7.45% 7.5 Egypt 1–3 IR Iran · 2.77% 2.8 Egypt 1–4 IR Iran · 0.78% 0.8 Egypt 1–5 IR Iran · 0.17% Egypt 1–6 IR Iran · 0.03% Egypt 1–7 IR Iran · 0.01% 36% 2 Egypt 2–0 IR Iran · 5.27% 5.3 Egypt 2–1 IR Iran · 5.88% 5.9 Egypt 2–2 IR Iran · 3.29% 3.3 Egypt 2–3 IR Iran · 1.22% 1.2 Egypt 2–4 IR Iran · 0.34% Egypt 2–5 IR Iran · 0.08% Egypt 2–6 IR Iran · 0.01% Egypt 2–7 IR Iran · 0.00% 16% 3 Egypt 3–0 IR Iran · 1.55% 1.5 Egypt 3–1 IR Iran · 1.73% 1.7 Egypt 3–2 IR Iran · 0.97% 1.0 Egypt 3–3 IR Iran · 0.36% Egypt 3–4 IR Iran · 0.10% Egypt 3–5 IR Iran · 0.02% Egypt 3–6 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 3–7 IR Iran · 0.00% 5% 4 Egypt 4–0 IR Iran · 0.34% Egypt 4–1 IR Iran · 0.38% Egypt 4–2 IR Iran · 0.21% Egypt 4–3 IR Iran · 0.08% Egypt 4–4 IR Iran · 0.02% Egypt 4–5 IR Iran · 0.01% Egypt 4–6 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 4–7 IR Iran · 0.00% 1% 5 Egypt 5–0 IR Iran · 0.06% Egypt 5–1 IR Iran · 0.07% Egypt 5–2 IR Iran · 0.04% Egypt 5–3 IR Iran · 0.01% Egypt 5–4 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 5–5 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 5–6 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 5–7 IR Iran · 0.00% 0% 6 Egypt 6–0 IR Iran · 0.01% Egypt 6–1 IR Iran · 0.01% Egypt 6–2 IR Iran · 0.01% Egypt 6–3 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 6–4 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 6–5 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 6–6 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 6–7 IR Iran · 0.00% 0% 7 Egypt 7–0 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 7–1 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 7–2 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 7–3 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 7–4 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 7–5 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 7–6 IR Iran · 0.00% Egypt 7–7 IR Iran · 0.00% 0%

Cells show P(exact scoreline); the right column and bottom row are the marginal totals P(Egypt scores k) and P(IR Iran scores k). Grid runs 0–7 goals per side; the 8–10-goal tail holds 0.00% of the mass and is omitted from the cells (not from the totals).

The grid makes IR Iran favourites at 39.8%, with a 32.7% draw. The single most-likely scoreline is 0–0 (14.7%), but no exact score clears 15% — the distribution is broad, as it should be.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Win · draw · loss

🇪🇬 Egypt 27.5% Draw 32.7% 🇮🇷 IR Iran 39.8%

Rounded values sum to exactly 100%.

Expected goals (λ)

🇪🇬Egypt 0.88
🇮🇷IR Iran 1.12

Poisson means feeding the grid; combined expected goals 2.00.

32.3% Over 2.5 goals P(3 or more goals in the match)
67.7% Under 2.5 goals complement of over-2.5
40.5% Both teams to score P(each side scores ≥ 1)
0–0 Most-likely scoreline modal exact score · 14.7%
Lumen Seattle, USA
Heat index 23°C apparent temperature (June–July)
Max temperature 23°C June–July daily high
Humidity 69% relative humidity
Altitude 14m above sea level

Source · Open-Meteo & venue records. Travel and time-zone exposure are per-team — see each side's dossier.

1,696 Elo rating 1,772
1.60 Recent NT form 2.00
€176M Squad value €63M
0.158 Squad form (global) 0.212
0.661 Fitness readiness 0.366
+0.25 Decoupling g +0.01

IR Iran carry the Elo edge (76 points). On the decoupling axis, Egypt is the side whose squad is valued higher relative to its record.

How a single-match forecast is built

The pairing is scored by the ensemble — Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled — yielding the 11×11 scoreline grid above. Win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over-2.5 and both-teams-to-score are all marginals of that one grid, so they are mutually consistent by construction. The strength inputs shown here feed the models; the forecast is their pooled output, not a manual weighting of these rows. The model matches the market out-of-sample (RPS 0.1891 vs 0.1905); it does not significantly beat it at n = 3. The ensemble, in full →