WC 2026 · Forecasting Oxford Football Forecasting
🇵🇦 Panama CONCACAF Elo 1,730 · world 32nd
5 / 16 / 79 win · draw · win most likely 0–2
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England UEFA Elo 2,021 · world 4th
Group
L
Date
Saturday 27 June 2026
Kick-off
21:00 UTC
Venue
New York/New Jersey Stadium, East Rutherford

Fig. V7 Ensemble · Group L

Panama v England — scoreline probabilities

0 Panama 0–0 England · 6.47% 6.5 Panama 0–1 England · 13.35% 13 Panama 0–2 England · 16.33% (most likely) 16 Panama 0–3 England · 12.79% 13 Panama 0–4 England · 7.52% 7.5 Panama 0–5 England · 3.53% 3.5 Panama 0–6 England · 1.38% 1.4 Panama 0–7 England · 0.46% 62% 1 Panama 1–0 England · 2.28% 2.3 Panama 1–1 England · 7.17% 7.2 Panama 1–2 England · 7.80% 7.8 Panama 1–3 England · 6.12% 6.1 Panama 1–4 England · 3.59% 3.6 Panama 1–5 England · 1.69% 1.7 Panama 1–6 England · 0.66% 0.7 Panama 1–7 England · 0.22% 30% 2 Panama 2–0 England · 0.68% 0.7 Panama 2–1 England · 1.59% 1.6 Panama 2–2 England · 1.86% 1.9 Panama 2–3 England · 1.46% 1.5 Panama 2–4 England · 0.86% 0.9 Panama 2–5 England · 0.40% Panama 2–6 England · 0.16% Panama 2–7 England · 0.05% 7% 3 Panama 3–0 England · 0.11% Panama 3–1 England · 0.25% Panama 3–2 England · 0.30% Panama 3–3 England · 0.23% Panama 3–4 England · 0.14% Panama 3–5 England · 0.06% Panama 3–6 England · 0.03% Panama 3–7 England · 0.01% 1% 4 Panama 4–0 England · 0.01% Panama 4–1 England · 0.03% Panama 4–2 England · 0.04% Panama 4–3 England · 0.03% Panama 4–4 England · 0.02% Panama 4–5 England · 0.01% Panama 4–6 England · 0.00% Panama 4–7 England · 0.00% 0% 5 Panama 5–0 England · 0.00% Panama 5–1 England · 0.00% Panama 5–2 England · 0.00% Panama 5–3 England · 0.00% Panama 5–4 England · 0.00% Panama 5–5 England · 0.00% Panama 5–6 England · 0.00% Panama 5–7 England · 0.00% 0% 6 Panama 6–0 England · 0.00% Panama 6–1 England · 0.00% Panama 6–2 England · 0.00% Panama 6–3 England · 0.00% Panama 6–4 England · 0.00% Panama 6–5 England · 0.00% Panama 6–6 England · 0.00% Panama 6–7 England · 0.00% 0% 7 Panama 7–0 England · 0.00% Panama 7–1 England · 0.00% Panama 7–2 England · 0.00% Panama 7–3 England · 0.00% Panama 7–4 England · 0.00% Panama 7–5 England · 0.00% Panama 7–6 England · 0.00% Panama 7–7 England · 0.00% 0%

Cells show P(exact scoreline); the right column and bottom row are the marginal totals P(Panama scores k) and P(England scores k). Grid runs 0–7 goals per side; the 8–10-goal tail holds 0.29% of the mass and is omitted from the cells (not from the totals).

The grid makes England favourites at 78.9%, with a 15.8% draw. The single most-likely scoreline is 0–2 (16.3%), but no exact score clears 16% — the distribution is broad, as it should be.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Win · draw · loss

🇵🇦 Panama 5.3% Draw 15.8% 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 England 78.9%

Rounded values sum to exactly 100%.

Expected goals (λ)

🇵🇦Panama 0.48
🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿England 2.35

Poisson means feeding the grid; combined expected goals 2.83.

53.7% Over 2.5 goals P(3 or more goals in the match)
46.3% Under 2.5 goals complement of over-2.5
34.9% Both teams to score P(each side scores ≥ 1)
0–2 Most-likely scoreline modal exact score · 16.3%
MetLife East Rutherford, USA
Heat index 31°C apparent temperature (June–July)
Max temperature 28°C June–July daily high
Humidity 70% relative humidity
Altitude 9m above sea level

Source · Open-Meteo & venue records. Travel and time-zone exposure are per-team — see each side's dossier.

1,730 Elo rating 2,021
1.67 Recent NT form 2.47
€38M Squad value €1878M
0.123 Squad form (global) 0.410
0.572 Fitness readiness 0.807
−0.35 Decoupling g −0.01

England carry the Elo edge (291 points). On the decoupling axis, England is the side whose squad is valued higher relative to its record.

How a single-match forecast is built

The pairing is scored by the ensemble — Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled — yielding the 11×11 scoreline grid above. Win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over-2.5 and both-teams-to-score are all marginals of that one grid, so they are mutually consistent by construction. The strength inputs shown here feed the models; the forecast is their pooled output, not a manual weighting of these rows. The model matches the market out-of-sample (RPS 0.1891 vs 0.1905); it does not significantly beat it at n = 3. The ensemble, in full →