WC 2026 · Forecasting Oxford Football Forecasting
🇨🇻

Cabo Verde

CAF Group H
0.0% Champion probability ±0.00 MC-SE
Coach
Bubista home · Cape Verdean
Elo (model)
1,578
Squad value
€51M
Power → Reality
45th 43rd +0.00 pp · neutral draw

Fig. D1 Fixture-aware · 100k sims

Cabo Verde — stage progression

Round of 32: 27.32% (95% MC 27.05%–27.60%; MC-SE ±0.14 pts) Round of 32 reach 27.3% ±0.14 Round of 16: 4.49% (95% MC 4.36%–4.61%; MC-SE ±0.07 pts) Round of 16 reach 4.5% ±0.07 Quarter-final: 0.78% (95% MC 0.72%–0.83%; MC-SE ±0.03 pts) Quarter-final reach 0.8% ±0.03 Semi-final: 0.10% (95% MC 0.08%–0.12%; MC-SE ±0.01 pts) Semi-final reach 0.1% ±0.01 Final: 0.01% (95% MC 0.01%–0.02%; MC-SE ±0.00 pts) Final reach 0.0% ±0.00 Champion: 0.00% (95% MC 0.00%–0.00%; MC-SE ±0.00 pts) Champion reach 0.0% ±0.00

Cabo Verde is most likely eliminated before the knockout rounds: 27% to clear the group. Champion probability 0.00%.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model
Group H Confed Advance (top 2) Reach R32
1🇪🇸SpainUEFA71.4%99.2%
2🇺🇾UruguayCONMEBOL37.2%89.6%
3🇸🇦Saudi ArabiaAFC6.5%35.1%
4🇨🇻Cabo VerdeCAF4.5%27.3%

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Bracket position Half 0 · Quadrant 1

Earliest possible meetings

No collision rows recorded for this team.

Collision = the earliest round the bracket wiring could pit Cabo Verde against that side. Full bracket & collision matrix →

Match 14 · 2026-06-15 · Atlanta Stadium away
Cabo Verde Spain
3.1% win 11.5% draw 85.4% loss
Most likely 0–2 (16.6%) λ 0.39–2.70 Over 2.5 60% · BTTS 31%
Match 37 · 2026-06-21 · Miami Stadium away
Cabo Verde Uruguay
10% win 24.1% draw 65.9% loss
Most likely 0–1 (17.5%) λ 0.52–1.72 Over 2.5 39% · BTTS 34%
Match 65 · 2026-06-27 · Houston Stadium home
Cabo Verde Saudi Arabia
28.7% win 32.5% draw 38.8% loss
Most likely 1–1 (14.5%) λ 0.92–1.11 Over 2.5 33% · BTTS 41%
How a match forecast is built

Each pairing is scored by the ensemble (Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled), producing an 11×11 scoreline grid that is marginalised into win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over/under 2.5 and both-teams-to-score. These are the same distributions the tournament simulator consumes, oriented here to Cabo Verde. Knockout fixtures are not shown — their occupants are still probabilistic, so there is no single pairing to forecast yet.

Fig. D2 Relative to the 48-team median

Cabo Verde vs the field

Elo rating: 1578 vs field median 1780 (0.89× the field) Elo rating 1578 med 1780 Recent NT form: 1.80 ppg vs field median 1.87 ppg (0.96× the field) Recent NT form 1.80 ppg med 1.87 ppg Squad value: €51M vs field median €286M (0.18× the field) Squad value €51M med €286M Squad form (global): 0.107 vs field median 0.211 (0.51× the field) Squad form (global) 0.107 med 0.211 Fitness readiness: 0.485 vs field median 0.707 (0.69× the field) Fitness readiness 0.485 med 0.707 Familiarity / chemistry: 0.000 vs field median 0.015 (0.00× the field) Familiarity / chemistry 0.000 med 0.015 Experience (mean caps): 19 vs field median 25 (0.78× the field) Experience (mean caps) 19 med 25

Read each row as a multiple of the field median: dots to the right of the dashed line are above-field, to the left below. Raw values are labelled on the right so the comparison is transparent.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Fig. D3 Bayesian projection residual g

Cabo Verde on the decoupling axis

aligned (0) ← record > squad price squad valued > record →

g = −0.16 ± 0.07: the record outruns the squad price — the team has achieved more than its comparatively modest squad value would predict.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model
What g means — and its limits

g is the residual from regressing a team’s current squad market value on its history-based strength in the Bayesian hierarchical model. Positive g means the squad is valued above what the team’s record predicts; negative means the record outruns the squad’s price (the side achieves more than its market value implies). Regressed on out-of-sample success the slope is positive — squad-rich sides go a touch further — but not statistically significant at n = 3 tournaments, so treat a single team’s g as a descriptive read, not a hard prediction. The full decoupling essay →

26players
26.3mean age
19mean caps
12%in a top-5 league
26distinct clubs
1largest club bloc
# Player Pos Club League Club min Gls Caps NT gls
1VozinhaGKChavesSegunda Liga +1.14z6300860
2StopiraDFTorreenseSegunda Liga +1.14z8481624
3DineyDFAl BataehPro League −0.09z1,9721302
4Roberto LopesDFShamrock Roversno club data450
5Logan CostaDFVillarrealLa Liga +2.13z290280
6Kevin PinaMFKrasnodarPremier League +0.27z1,2811313
7Jovane CabralMFEstrela Amadorano club data272
8João PauloMFFCSBLiga I1,1702421
9Gilson BenchimolFWAkron TolyattiPremier League +0.27z1,27210226
10Jamiro MonteiroMFPEC ZwolleEredivisie +0.74z1,4552555
11Garry RodriguesMFApollon Limassol1. Division −0.31z79536010
12Márcio RosaGKMontanaFirst League1,1700110
13Sidny Lopes CabralDFBenficaPrimeira Liga +1.14z458193
14Deroy DuarteMFLudogorets RazgradFirst League2,5391300
15Laros DuarteMFPuskás Akadémiano club data131
16Yannick SemedoMFFarenseSegunda Liga +1.14z6080101
17Willy SemedoMFOmoniano club data383
18Telmo ArcanjoMFVitória de GuimarãesPrimeira Liga +1.14z1,2581161
19Dailon LivramentoFWCasa PiaPrimeira Liga +1.14z1,0600227
20Ryan Mendes (captain)FWIğdırno club data9822
21Nuno da CostaMFİstanbul BaşakşehirSüper Lig +0.49z1,183592
22Steven MoreiraDFColumbus CrewMajor League Soccer −0.71z3,1121200
23CJ dos SantosGKSan Diego FCMajor League Soccer −0.71z2,838010
24Wagner PinaDFTrabzonsporSüper Lig +0.49z5,0132130
25Kelvin PiresDFSJKVeikkausliiga907051
26Hélio VarelaMFMaccabi Tel AvivLigat Ha'al −0.55z1,9253200

Source · Official squad announcements · API-Football (global club coverage). 5 of 26 players have no club season matched in API-Football — shown as “— no club data”, not imputed. Form coverage for this squad: 81%.

Diaspora in the hosts

36,257

69.0 per 1,000 of home population

Host-language familiarity

Foreign

primary language Portuguese

Climate adaptation gap

+0.6°C

home-vs-venue heat differential

Venue extremes

47°C

peak heat index · altitude up to 313 m

Travel

4h

max time-zone shift · nearest venue 5,459 km

Source · UN DESA international migrant stock · US Census Bureau · Open-Meteo & venue records

Fig. D4 eloratings.net method · year-end values

Cabo Verde — Elo since 1959

1654 world #85
Cabo Verde Qualified-field median

Cabo Verde ends the series at 1654 Elo, the world’s 85th-ranked side — below the qualified-field median.

Source · eloratings.net
Which Elo is this?

This line is the public eloratings.net series (year-end ratings), which terminates exactly at the current rating and world rank shown on the marker. It is a different number from the Elo shown in the header band (a panel-normalised rating used inside the forecast); the two are ~0.99 correlated but on different scales. We keep them distinct rather than blend them.

81% Squad club-form coverage Share of this squad with a matched club season feeding the global form layer.
81% Fitness-readiness coverage Where below 100%, part of the fitness signal is imputed by the de-biasing layer.
n = 3 Out-of-sample tournaments The model is validated on three held-out World Cups; it matches the market, it does not beat it.

Validated on n=3 held-out tournaments; coverage below 1.0 means part of this squad's club-form/fitness is imputed (the global de-biasing layer). For Cabo Verde, 5 of 26 players are shown as “— no club data”. Full validation, calibration & conformal coverage →