WC 2026 · Forecasting Oxford Football Forecasting
🇸🇦

Saudi Arabia

AFC Group H
0.0% Champion probability ±0.00 MC-SE
Coach
Georgios Donis foreign · Greek
Elo (model)
1,569 world 75th
Squad value
€38M
Power → Reality
43rd 40th +0.00 pp · neutral draw

Fig. D1 Fixture-aware · 100k sims

Saudi Arabia — stage progression

Round of 32: 35.10% (95% MC 34.81%–35.40%; MC-SE ±0.15 pts) Round of 32 reach 35.1% ±0.15 Round of 16: 6.49% (95% MC 6.34%–6.64%; MC-SE ±0.08 pts) Round of 16 reach 6.5% ±0.08 Quarter-final: 1.23% (95% MC 1.16%–1.30%; MC-SE ±0.03 pts) Quarter-final reach 1.2% ±0.03 Semi-final: 0.18% (95% MC 0.15%–0.21%; MC-SE ±0.01 pts) Semi-final reach 0.2% ±0.01 Final: 0.03% (95% MC 0.02%–0.04%; MC-SE ±0.01 pts) Final reach 0.0% ±0.01 Champion: 0.00% (95% MC 0.00%–0.01%; MC-SE ±0.00 pts) Champion reach 0.0% ±0.00

Saudi Arabia is most likely eliminated before the knockout rounds: 35% to clear the group. Champion probability 0.00%.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model
Group H Confed Advance (top 2) Reach R32
1🇪🇸SpainUEFA71.4%99.2%
2🇺🇾UruguayCONMEBOL37.2%89.6%
3🇸🇦Saudi ArabiaAFC6.5%35.1%
4🇨🇻Cabo VerdeCAF4.5%27.3%

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Bracket position Half 0 · Quadrant 1

Earliest possible meetings

No collision rows recorded for this team.

Collision = the earliest round the bracket wiring could pit Saudi Arabia against that side. Full bracket & collision matrix →

Match 13 · 2026-06-15 · Miami Stadium home
Saudi Arabia Uruguay
11.3% win 25.5% draw 63.2% loss
Most likely 0–1 (17.7%) λ 0.55–1.63 Over 2.5 37% · BTTS 35%
Match 38 · 2026-06-21 · Atlanta Stadium away
Saudi Arabia Spain
3.1% win 11.2% draw 85.7% loss
Most likely 0–2 (15.8%) λ 0.42–2.78 Over 2.5 62% · BTTS 32%
Match 65 · 2026-06-27 · Houston Stadium away
Saudi Arabia Cabo Verde
38.8% win 32.5% draw 28.7% loss
Most likely 1–1 (14.5%) λ 1.11–0.92 Over 2.5 33% · BTTS 41%
How a match forecast is built

Each pairing is scored by the ensemble (Dixon-Coles bivariate-Poisson, the Bayesian hierarchical model and the global LightGBM-Poisson, log-pooled), producing an 11×11 scoreline grid that is marginalised into win/draw/loss, expected goals (λ), over/under 2.5 and both-teams-to-score. These are the same distributions the tournament simulator consumes, oriented here to Saudi Arabia. Knockout fixtures are not shown — their occupants are still probabilistic, so there is no single pairing to forecast yet.

Fig. D2 Relative to the 48-team median

Saudi Arabia vs the field

Elo rating: 1569 vs field median 1780 (0.88× the field) Elo rating 1569 med 1780 Recent NT form: 1.53 ppg vs field median 1.87 ppg (0.82× the field) Recent NT form 1.53 ppg med 1.87 ppg Squad value: €38M vs field median €286M (0.13× the field) Squad value €38M med €286M Squad form (global): 0.090 vs field median 0.211 (0.43× the field) Squad form (global) 0.090 med 0.211 Fitness readiness: 0.679 vs field median 0.707 (0.96× the field) Fitness readiness 0.679 med 0.707 Familiarity / chemistry: 0.141 vs field median 0.015 (9.19× the field) Familiarity / chemistry 0.141 med 0.015 Experience (mean caps): 23 vs field median 25 (0.92× the field) Experience (mean caps) 23 med 25

Read each row as a multiple of the field median: dots to the right of the dashed line are above-field, to the left below. Raw values are labelled on the right so the comparison is transparent.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model

Fig. D3 Bayesian projection residual g

Saudi Arabia on the decoupling axis

aligned (0) ← record > squad price squad valued > record →

g = −0.34 ± 0.09: the record outruns the squad price — the team has achieved more than its comparatively modest squad value would predict.

Source · Oxford Football Forecasting model
What g means — and its limits

g is the residual from regressing a team’s current squad market value on its history-based strength in the Bayesian hierarchical model. Positive g means the squad is valued above what the team’s record predicts; negative means the record outruns the squad’s price (the side achieves more than its market value implies). Regressed on out-of-sample success the slope is positive — squad-rich sides go a touch further — but not statistically significant at n = 3 tournaments, so treat a single team’s g as a descriptive read, not a hard prediction. The full decoupling essay →

26players
25.4mean age
23mean caps
4%in a top-5 league
9distinct clubs
7largest club bloc
# Player Pos Club League Club min Gls Caps NT gls
1Nawaf Al-AqidiGKAl-NassrPro League −0.86z9600220
2Ali MajrashiDFAl-AhliPro League −0.86z2,7231210
3Ali LajamiDFAl-HilalPro League −0.86z2,2620211
4Abdulelah Al-AmriDFAl-NassrPro League −0.86z2,4323421
5Hassan Al-TambaktiDFAl-HilalPro League −0.86z5,2761511
6Nasser Al-DawsariMFAl-HilalPro League −0.86z3,5390430
7Musab Al-JuwayrMFAl-QadsiahPro League −0.86z2,5406346
8Ayman YahyaFWAl-NassrPro League −0.86z1,5343260
9Firas Al-BuraikanFWAl-AhliPro League −0.86z2,23376915
10Salem Al-Dawsari (captain)FWAl-HilalPro League −0.86z2,4271110927
11Saleh Al-ShehriFWAl-IttihadPro League −0.86z1,11865518
12Saud AbdulhamidDFLensLigue 1 +1.70z4,4256541
13Nawaf BoushalDFAl-NassrPro League −0.86z4,0090240
14Hassan KadeshDFAl-IttihadPro League −0.86z5,3586202
15Abdullah Al-KhaibariMFAl-NassrPro League −0.86z4,1131390
16Ziyad Al-JohaniMFAl-AhliPro League −0.86z2,0611120
17Khalid Al-GhannamFWAl-Ettifaqno club data60
18Alaa Al-HejjiMFNeomPro League −0.86z2,916520
19Abdullah Al-HamdanFWAl-NassrPro League −0.86z41354912
20Sultan MandashFWAl-HilalPro League −0.86z621462
21Mohammed Al-OwaisGKAl-Ulano club data630
22Ahmed Al-KassarGKAl-QadsiahPro League −0.86z205090
23Mohamed KannoMFAl-HilalPro League −0.86z4,0096768
24Moteb Al-HarbiDFAl-HilalPro League −0.86z4,8013120
25Jehad ThakriDFAl-QadsiahPro League −0.86z1,520070
26Mohammed Abu Al-ShamatDFAl-QadsiahPro League −0.86z2,497360

Source · Official squad announcements · API-Football (global club coverage). 2 of 26 players have no club season matched in API-Football — shown as “— no club data”, not imputed. Form coverage for this squad: 92%.

Diaspora in the hosts

99,687

3.0 per 1,000 of home population

Host-language familiarity

Foreign

primary language Arabic

Climate adaptation gap

−11.0°C

home-vs-venue heat differential

Venue extremes

47°C

peak heat index · altitude up to 313 m

Travel

9h

max time-zone shift · nearest venue 10,241 km

Source · UN DESA international migrant stock · US Census Bureau · Open-Meteo & venue records

Fig. D4 eloratings.net method · year-end values

Saudi Arabia — Elo since 1963

1687 world #75
Saudi Arabia Qualified-field median

Saudi Arabia ends the series at 1687 Elo, the world’s 75th-ranked side — below the qualified-field median.

Source · eloratings.net
Which Elo is this?

This line is the public eloratings.net series (year-end ratings), which terminates exactly at the current rating and world rank shown on the marker. It is a different number from the Elo shown in the header band (a panel-normalised rating used inside the forecast); the two are ~0.99 correlated but on different scales. We keep them distinct rather than blend them.

92% Squad club-form coverage Share of this squad with a matched club season feeding the global form layer.
92% Fitness-readiness coverage Where below 100%, part of the fitness signal is imputed by the de-biasing layer.
n = 3 Out-of-sample tournaments The model is validated on three held-out World Cups; it matches the market, it does not beat it.

Validated on n=3 held-out tournaments; coverage below 1.0 means part of this squad's club-form/fitness is imputed (the global de-biasing layer). For Saudi Arabia, 2 of 26 players are shown as “— no club data”. Full validation, calibration & conformal coverage →